The set is enormous
Base agreement, general conditions, exhibits, addenda — hundreds of pages that only make sense read together, often scanned, rotated, or marked up by hand.
Agent · Contract Review
Upload the base agreement, the general conditions, the exhibits and the addenda. Get back playbook-scored findings across seven review areas, a summary of the commercial terms, answers to anything you ask, and a redline your team can send — with every flag traced to the clause it came from.
Who it's for
Firms signing seven-figure agreements — AIA A104, A101, ConsensusDocs, or an owner's own paper — with no in-house legal team and a signing date that never moves. Outside counsel is too slow and too expensive for every contract, so most get a skim.
The agent doesn't replace your lawyer. It makes sure that when a lawyer or a principal does read it, they start from a scored, cited list of what actually matters — instead of page one. Advisory output; a qualified person reviews and approves. Not legal advice.
Structure, risk allocation, damages, insurance & bonding, notices, payment & termination, site conditions.
Severity scored against your firm's positions, cloneable per client or project — not a vendor's generic ruleset.
Base agreement plus exhibits and addenda, combined and reviewed together — or one merged PDF.
Page and section on every finding, quoted wherever the clause exists. Un-sourced findings are dropped before the report is assembled.
01 / The friction
The terms that cost you money are rarely hidden. They are standard, boring, and buried on page 140 of a document that has to be signed on Friday.
Base agreement, general conditions, exhibits, addenda — hundreds of pages that only make sense read together, often scanned, rotated, or marked up by hand.
A 200% punch-list holdback. A notice clause that voids your claim because you emailed it. Ordinary language, easy to skim past, expensive months later.
Two reviewers flag different things, and nothing records what was checked or cleared. When a claim lands, that record is exactly what you wish you had.
02 / What we built
The model detects. Code scores, verifies, and assembles.
The language model reads and detects. Everything consequential after that — severity scoring, citation verification, redline assembly — runs as deterministic code, so the same contract produces the same answer twice and every step is inspectable.
03 / The guarantees
Properties of the system, enforced in code and in CI.
These are not projections or averages. They are properties the pipeline enforces on every contract, locked in by the evaluation gate so they cannot quietly regress.
The principle
Keep the judgment with your people. Give the reading to the system.
— How every RivetData agent is scoped
04 / Questions
The full contract set: the base agreement, the general conditions, the exhibits and the addenda, combined and reviewed together, or one merged PDF. That covers AIA A104 and A101, ConsensusDocs, or an owner's own paper. Scanned pages are read too, and struck-through text is detected, so a deleted clause is never scored as a live term.
Seven review areas on every contract: structure, risk allocation, damages, insurance and bonding, notices, payment and termination, and site conditions. Each finding is scored against your firm's playbook by deterministic code, not by the model's judgement, so two reviewers land on the same answer. A hard block is raised when a term breaches a position you've marked non-negotiable.
Every finding points to the page and section it came from, with the quoted language wherever the clause exists; a clause that is missing is reported as missing. A verification pass drops any finding that isn't backed by its source before the report is assembled, and clicking a finding highlights the clause in the document beside it.
Playbook-scored findings across the seven review areas, a contract and fee summary, cited answers to the questions you ask, and a Word redline. You triage each finding (accept, negotiate or flag for review), and only the items you mark Ready reach the document. Your internal notes never do.
No. The output is advisory: a draft that a qualified person reviews and approves. The agent doesn't replace your lawyer. It means that when a lawyer or a principal reads the contract, they start from a scored, cited list of what actually matters instead of page one.
No. Your contract is never used to train a model.
Try it on your own paper
Send it over and we'll return a cited findings report on your own document — free, and with no obligation.